;
;

Friday, May 8, 2009

Can You Tell This Child Is Autistic?

(Yes, i know i said in my last post that i was aiming to write something every day in May, and it's now the 8th and i haven't. My internet went down on Sunday night, and i didn't get it back until yesterday. I've also written a couple of things that weren't public blog posts. Anyway, this is the post that i had *intended* to do on Sunday night, before my mysterious (but luckily easily fixable) cable fault...)

My parents recently gave me a memory card for my digital camera (among other things) for my birthday. On the card were various sets of old photos that my dad had either taken with his camera, or scanned in from old pre-digital photos, one of which was a set of photos of me and my brother as children. I'm absolutely terrible at guessing children's ages, but i would guess that in these photos i look about 10 and my brother about 3, which dates them at round about 1992...

The thing that most strikes me about these photos is that, even if it wasn't me (and i'm not sure if i look at all recognisable as the same person as me now at a long-haired and bearded 27), i would be instantly sure from looking at them that the older boy was autistic. I'm not sure exactly what would bring me to this conclusion, but i think it's some combination of posture, facial expressions, and just possibly an actually physical "look" that i've noticed many (although by no means all) autistic people i've met have (something i'll probably get round to writing about in more detail reasonably soon).



(Yes, this is the sort of sitting position that i felt comfortable in as a kid. I also liked, up until i was at least 13 or so, to sit with my legs crossed in a very stereotypically "feminine" way, right thigh over left thigh or vice versa. I only stopped when i was taught in no uncertain terms at secondary school - when i was just starting to try to have friends and be accepted by other children - that it was unacceptable for a boy to do. It utterly puzzled me though, and still does really, what was/is gendered about that (well, i know physical anatomy, but still, sex != gender)...)



I also think this is a very "autistic" hand position... though i'm not quite sure why...



This was another typical pose for me. Although it was before i started having weird things going on with my joints, i wonder if the positioning of my right foot there does have something to do with my right ankle being one of the joints i get the most weird flexion and "clicking" with now.

(If anyone's wondering where the photos were taken... i think it was most likely Sherwood Forest, hence the Robin Hood caps. However, it also could have been the New Forest in Hampshire, as we stayed at my aunt's house there for a couple of weeks every summer for most of my childhood.)

Here's one of me sitting in a tree:



While i'm not sure there's anything particularly "autistic-looking" about me in that photo, it does show something of the expression i very, very often had (and occasionally still have) in photos, which got/gets misinterpreted as "fear"; in a couple of my school class photographs, i have been told that i stand out immediately from the (identically dressed) group of children because, to NT eyes, i look utterly terrified. For a long time i really hated photos of myself because they seemed to show, blatantly and undeniably, the "wrongness" of my facial expressions, which i was constantly trying to convince myself i was going to "overcome", while of course not really knowing what it consisted of either - it's only in the last few years that i've really got over this and started to find photos of me tolerable to look at.

This one was taken in my back garden at my parents' house, and i think makes me look particularly autistic:



The facial expression, the pose and the very stereotypical "acting out" of an "appropriate" emotion towards a fictional enemy (as i recall, the figure on the chalkboard was a henchman of the Sheriff of Nottingham who we had been practising firing our bows and arrows at - probably a few days after going to Sherwood Forest) - and indeed the fantasy play based on a recently visited location - all strike me as *very* typical of the autistic spectrum.

Also note what i was wearing - as a child, i had major sensory issues with clothing, and only found a very small range of clothes comfortable enough to be tolerable wearing. I don't think i ever stripped myself naked in public (i was too sensitive to cold for that), but i remember ripping my school uniform off as soon as i got through the door, finding it *very* difficult to cope with wearing a tie (something i still think is one of the most utterly pointless things ever invented, and its mandatory presence as "professional wear" in the majority of corporate offices is one of those things that just makes me go "WTF is this world?"). Outside school, the only trousers i would wear were these "tracksuit bottoms" - which were made of a very soft material and had elastic or a drawstring instead of a zip fly, meaning they had to be pulled all the way down to use the toilet (another thing that, therefore, had gendered stigma as well as disability stigma in schoolboy culture). Again, once in secondary school, i tried to wear jeans after finding out that wearing tracksuit trousers was "not normal", but found them horribly uncomfortable (although some of my sensory issues lessened a bit around that age).

(I finally threw away my last pair of jeans a couple of years ago, after realising that i had owned them for about 8 years and hadn't worn them in about 5, after discovering a perfect solution in the form of the "combat" style trousers i now wear pretty much exclusively, which are comfortable, practical (i now couldn't live without the side pockets, giving me 4 pockets per pair of trousers, as opposed to the 2 of most jeans and "formal" trousers) and, as far as i can tell, lacking in particular stigma.)

The stigma attached to those trousers is something i should perhaps explain, as it might be a strictly UK thing, i'm not sure. (It also might have been stronger in the 90s than now, again i'm not sure.) If a child over about 8 was seen wearing those sort of trousers, then they either had "something wrong with them", ie they were "retarded" or "mental" or "not all there", or indeed just "weird", which was a bit of a cover-all, or else their parents were too poor to afford to buy them "proper" trousers, which in the intensely disablist and classist (although not at all aware of either of those terms) world of suburban children in the 80s and 90s (and probably now, although i don't have direct observations) amounted to much the same thing - an acceptable target of taunting and bullying. An adult wearing that sort of thing would definitely be seen as having "something wrong with them", to the extent that they were seen almost as a symbolic uniform of learning disability (with attendant stereotypes about institutional living, incapability of achieving "independence", etc) - someone who wore them either did not choose their own clothes, or was so oblivious to norms of clothing choice that they had to be "not all there".

(There is a whole load of other stuff i could spin off that, about clothing, disability, stigma and more, but i don't have time right now and it probably deserves a post of its own...)

Anyway, i've strayed from my main point. As a child, as far as i know, I did not have any diagnosis of an autism spectrum disorder (and i was sent to several different child psychologists, and the subject of a huge amount of (mostly negative) "concern" about me, despite my very high academic achievements, for my complete lack of social integration with other children throughout my primary school years) - yet, looking back, it seems almost impossible that anyone, with even the level of familiarity with autism that most people in the general population now have simply through the mainstream media, could have observed me for more than a couple of minutes without identifying me as autistic. I had practically every stereotypical characteristic of autistic children, including many that tend to be regarded as unfair and erroneous stereotypes (which always makes me feel a bit awkward when they are discussed as such, because i want to say "er, as a child i actually was that") - a total lack of interest in or emotion about other "real" human beings (while having incredibly intense attachments to fictional characters), dozens of sensory intolerances, including refusal to eat the vast majority of foods and finiding nearly all human touch intolerable, meltdowns involving uncontrollable crying and attacking other children, selective mutism, obsessive memorising of facts and figures about narrow topics of interest, hand-flapping (i recall my mother telling me at about 8 "don't do that with your hands, it makes you look like a spastic"), pronoun confusion - you name it, i had it, basically... yet, AFAIK, autism was not even mentioned in reference to me throughout my childhood.

Why this was, i have utterly no idea. I have often wondered how much different my life would be if i had been diagnosed as autistic in childhood - on the one hand, i wouldn't have spent so long living in denial, confusion, self-hatred and paranoia, thinking "what the fuck is wrong with me, and why won't anyone explain to me all these things that everyone else seems to understand perfectly naturally, and yet somehow i don't?", i possibly wouldn't have alienated so many people who i tried and failed to be friends with and ended up offending or turning against me for reasons i couldn't comprehend at all, i probably wouldn't have got sucked into some of the profoundly unpleasant ideologies i spent much of my teenage years in, and things within my family very probably wouldn't have been as fucked up as they were (in ways that were not exactly anyone's fault, although i spent a long time blaming my parents and a longer time blaming myself for much of it) - but then, if i had been diagnosed as a child, would the educational ambitions my parents and teachers had for me have been "downsized"? Would i have ended up in some sort of "special" school instead of the selective-by-educational-ability grammar school i did end up in, and would i have had the ambition to go to university? Would i be a part of intellectual community now? More generally, would i have had the sustaining belief that i could, or at least had the right to, be as independent and achieve as much as any neurotypical person, or would i have "accepted" my inability to know what was best for myself? Would i have been better off with a better knowledge of my own limits, or was my lack of understanding of those limits at certain crucial stages of my life necessary? I strongly suspect, therefore, that while some aspects of my life could well have been much better with an early diagnosis, other aspects of my life could well have been much worse, and, of course, it would be impossible to ever fully know.

So, i'm interested in what other people on the spectrum, or people with friends or family members on the spectrum, think of these photographs - when you look at them, do you instantly see an autistic person? If someone whose child you hadn't met showed you those photos, would you guess that the child was autistic? And, more generally, do you think autistic people can reliably identify other autistic people by looking at them? (As an adult, i have been told both that my "Aspie mannerisms" were obvious before i said anything about my diagnosis, and that me saying i had an AS diagnosis was surprising because it "really wasn't obvious". I actually think i have become somewhat more obvious in the last few years, since discovering autistic community, because many of the semi-conscious ways of repressing my natural mannerisms and imitating neurotypical ways of moving, facial expressions, etc have "worn off".) And did anyone else who was diagnosed as an adult have similar experiences of finding it hard to believe they were never diagnosed as a child, because it was really obvious?

I need to write some stuff about diagnosis and labelling more generally, but i think that's an interesting discussion starting point. (Also, credit is, i think, deserved to AnneC of Existence is Wonderful for partially inspiring this with a post based around photos of and by her at a similar age...)

I won't be posting tomorrow or Saturday because i'm off to London for a conference and a friend's birthday. But i will hopefully have time to post daily-ish for the next week or so from Sunday...

9 comments:

Ettina said...

One thing I've noticed in portraits of families with one autistic member is that the autie is usually the one looking in a different direction from all the others. My father shows this, in a photo of him as a kid that he showed me.
In my own portraits, I find that if I *knew* I was being photographed, I look fairly standard, but if I didn't know I was being photographed I look autistic. I suspect I have a tendency to suddenly switch to NT posture & mannerisms whenever I'm thinking about how I look to others.
One of the big classic autistic things is holding your arms up, a bit like how predatory dinosaurs are usually depicted. This is also typical of cerebral palsy, but with CP the arms are tense in this posture, while autistics having this posture look much more relaxed. Some NTs also hold their arms like this, especially when running, but they do so much less often.

Lindsay said...

Wow, that was really interesting and thought-provoking. Worth waiting for, to be sure. :)

And no, I do not see anything particularly autistic-looking about you in those photos. This could just be me failing to detect subtleties of facial expression and posture, since I do that, but you seem in those pictures to be very conscious of the photographer, looking at hir and posing for hir, while what I think of as a typically "autistic" thing in photos is not to look at the camera, and to have sort of a faraway expression on one's face.

About the class/disability stigma associated with certain clothes, I noticed this too. There didn't seem to be any problem with tracksuit bottoms --- I think "normal" dress might be a lot more relaxed in the US, as lots of young men and women walk around wearing those, or sweatpants, or pajama bottoms. But what I do remember being stigmatized for was wearing Velcro shoes. I didn't learn to tie shoelaces until I was twelve or so, so I wore shoes with Velcro on them all through elementary school. This was unusual, and I acquired the nickname "Velcro."

(I still prefer shoes that slip on rather than tie).

I also share the thing about having characteristic often pooh-poohed as pernicious stereotypes: until I was eleven or so, I didn't actually perceive people around me as agents, as opposed to just particularly noisy, unpredictable moving parts of the environment; my memory is almost entirely made up of random sensory impressions, without much narrative or emotional content; I can't read faces, gestures, or vocal intonations; I can't stand to be touched, or even to be too close to another person. A lot of the sensory stuff I don't see being dismissed, but I certainly see a backlash within the autism-acceptance movement against the idea that we differ much from NTs in our emotions.

Lindsay said...

Also, Donna Williams does something like this --- showing old photos of herself as a child and pointing out what she thinks is "autistic" about herself --- in Nobody Nowhere.I don't know if you've read that book, but in it she describes taking on several characters to deal with the world around her: there's the nice, people-pleasing Carol and the defiant, angry Willie.

In some of the photos, she identifies which character she's playing.

But in the ones where she's herself, particularly at very young ages, she calls attention to where her gaze is directed: it's never at the camera, usually at the ground, at her clothes or at something in her hand. She calls this her "preoccupation with the tactile, nonsocial world."

AnneC said...

Interesting post. The first picture definitely says "unusual posture" to me; it's sort of hard to make out what's going on in the others, though, so difficult to say.

However, re. your explanation about the clothing/tracksuit pants thing: I've grown up in the US (and was born in late 1978 so I'm close to your age) and there *was* definitely some amount of stigma associated with certain sorts of clothing.

And one very odd thing I recall in relation to that was when I was wearing one of my favorite outfits at the time (red tracksuit pullover/gray fleece pants) and some kids announced to me that my outfit was stupid. Apparently, as they explained it, tracksuits were fine, but not the way *I* was wearing it, and the colors were "wrong", or something. Fashion was definitely a really confounding puzzle...

AnneC said...

Oh, and re. "stereotypical" stuff -- my early memories are also pretty much all recorded sensory impressions. As far as emotions go, though, I know I've FELT plenty...I am, however, extremely confused regarding the *language* surrounding emotions. And inner sensations of any kind. Like for years and years I used to say that I never had headaches...only later on it turned out that one of the things I'd been classifying under "random weird body-noise" was actually "pain in the head". Only it took me years to notice it was the thing people called "pain", and localize it to my head! And same for a lot of emotional stuff too...a lot of it has just seemed "noisy" to the point where I've been able to identify Really Good or Really Awful, but without any describable subtlety. I know I have feelings and all and I have physiological responses that indicate emotion but knowing what to CALL that stuff and how to describe it has always led to either getting stuck wordless or coming out with these long verbose poem-like things just trying to hit the target, so to speak!

Jain said...

Hi, great post and I'm really enjoying reading the rest of your blog :) re: people not noticing you were autistic when you were a child - it could be because the diagnostic criteria were so limited during the 80s. The 1980 DSM III criteria specified autism (they call it 'infantile' autism) as having an onset by 30 months and autistic children as always having gross deficits in language development. Although the definition and criteria were modified and expanded in 1987 (dropping 'infantile' and renaming it 'autistic disorder') it's possible that the child psychologist(s) you saw didn't pick up on this or just ignored it as they had already decided that you didn't fit the 1980 criteria for autism. Also, pre-internet it took a looong time for changes in diagnostic criteria to spread and become widely accepted and AS was only added to DSM IV in 1994 (it has such limited criteria as well that many doctors/psychologists probably have a very narrow stereotype of how someone with AS behaves.)

Jain said...

I'm really enjoying your blog and find it thought provoking and inspiring! I'm particularly interested in the social model of disability (partly because of my own progressive physical impairment). I'm involved in an anarchist discussion group and we'll be talking about disablism and the social model of disability at some point and I'd really like to correspond with you about it to learn some more.

all the best

Jain

Oliver A. FP said...

I have many thoughts about this post, and am just going to spew them out incoherently, I'm afraid.

I would definitely guess that you were on the spectrum.

Re being able to recognise others - I have a friend with a great career and extensive social life, who can play all social roles perfectly. Nothing in his behaviour could be recognised as Aspergers-ish, except the socially acceptable dedication to his work.

I knew. A mutual friend with Asperger's tentatively guessed. We are right.

Maybe the social persona was too perfect. This guy is, with no hyperbole, a genius, and has applied his extensive intellect to the creation of a socially acceptable identity. I don't think anyone who isn't on the spectrum could guess the extent to which he isn't neurotypical.

I'd met another friend twice before I instructed him to go and get tested for autism (at our university, people with the diagnosis really do get appropriate help). It was only after those brief meetings that I learned he had every single stereotypically autistic behaviour.

I'm almost 20. Even if I am young enough to have gotten a diagnosis in childhood, my GP then was just... crap. Couldn't diagnose a broken leg. My mum would take me to the doctor with, essentially, the statement "There's something weird about my kid!" and they just reckoned she was a proud mother showing off my savant abilities. Yes, I could read at an adult level at 4, but I couldn't hold the simplest conversation, and it would take three more years before I could tie a shoelace. I painted by filling the paper with paint, waiting for that layer to dry, filling the paper with paint... I screamed and screamed if my routine was disturbed...

You get the idea. And I agree with you - it would have been nice to have a reason for my difficulties, but people would have expected less of me. And when people don't expect much of you, you don't generally achieve it.

Finally, yes, the distinguishing thing about my childhood photos is that all my clothes are several sizes too big, and always made of loose cotton rather than, say, those fashionable jeans that the other children wore. I'm a trans man, and always detested dresses, but wore them constantly because they didn't pinch and itch and burn like hell, like all trousers.

So, in all those words I have nothing to add to your post! Other than... yes, this is exactly what it's like...

shiva said...

Hmmm... interesting that some people have said they couldn't tell from the photos that I was on the spectrum, and others that they could. Will have to think about that a bit more...

Jain - good point re the diagnostic stuff. I do, however, know at least 3 people within a couple of years of my age who got childhood diagnoses, but i strongly suspect that, at that time, it might have been dependent on things as arbitrary as what part of the country you were in...

Also, i'll email you :)

Oliver - i see you're at York. I know at least one other Aspie who went to York (he is an activist, tho on environmental rather than disability-related stuff, and the partner of a very close friend), but i don't know if you would know each other, as he went there a few years ago (not sure exactly how long ago, but he's 28 now). He too reckoned York was good for student support on neurodiversity stuff (although there wasn't, AFAIK, anyone from York at the conference on disabled students' experiences of higher education i went to in Huddersfield a few weeks ago).

The North of England does seem to be where it's at for intersections of trans/queer and disability/neurodiversity stuff, tho...

Also, this is interesting:

I'm a trans man, and always detested dresses, but wore them constantly because they didn't pinch and itch and burn like hell, like all trousers.I'm MAAB, non-transitioning genderqueer, but probably just about the *one* thing i am grateful for being MAAB for is the "standard" casual clothing, because most "female-assigned" clothing looks to me like it would be utterly unbearable to wear while doing... pretty much anything other than standing around being looked at, really. Then again, my particular sensory issues are a bit complicated in that i feel uncomfortable wearing clothing that is either too restrictive or not restrictive enough (and i have a bit of a kink for the sort of constriction you would get from, say, a corset... but that would definitely not be something i'd be comfortable with as casual wear). Also, i think my biggest sensory issue with a skirt or dress would be cold...

I was definitely very aware of being photographed as a child in general, and consciously posing for the camera in at least some of those photos, but i'm not sure if that's because my dad (the photographer in the family) was so insistent about getting me to look at the camera from a very early age that it became ingrained through Pavlovian learning rather than "instinct"...